(ENDANGERED SPECIES) Animal advocates have filed a lawsuit forcing the federal government to protect endangered species. This move repeals recently imposed rules by the Trump administration that would put endangered species like manatees, bald eagles, gray wolves, and grizzly bears at risk of extinction.
Read on to learn more about how the Animal Legal Defense Fund is fighting for the protections of some of the most vulnerable species on the planet–in both the wild and in captivity.
October 22, 2019
Animal Legal Defense Fund, Natalia Lima
SAN FRANCISCO – Today the Animal Legal Defense Fund, the nation’s preeminent legal advocacy organization for animals, filed a lawsuit to force the federal government to repeal recently imposed rules under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The lawsuit specifically details the importance of ESA protections for animals in captivity, in addition to how these changes harm wild animals.
The ESA is one of the most important legal tools protecting the lives of animals. The ESA has prevented the extinction of numerous iconic American animals including the northern gray wolf, the bald eagle, the Florida manatee, and the grizzly bear.
This law also provides critical protections for threatened and endangered animals languishing in captivity across the United States. The Animal Legal Defense Fund set a critical legal precedent applying the ESA to captive endangered animals in 2016 —affirmed on appeal in 2018 — regarding the treatment of four tigers and three lemurs held at a roadside zoo in Iowa.
“The Endangered Species Act allows us to use the legal system to protect some of the most vulnerable species on the planet, in the wild and in captivity,” says Animal Legal Defense Fund Executive Director Stephen Wells. “The new rules put both wild and captive animals at further risk of mistreatment and extinction.”
In August, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) announced the new rules that weaken the ESA. The changes include:
- Making it easier to “delist” species, meaning they no longer receive ESA protections.
- No immediate protections for newly-listed “threatened” species – those that are threatened with extinction. Captive threatened animals are especially susceptible to mistreatment. The ESA clearly requires the government to protect threatened species.
- Economic factors, instead of scientific analysis, can now be considered when deciding whether a species merits protection.
- It’s harder to protect animals from the growing climate crisis because, among other changes, the new rules make it more difficult to designate an area as “critical habitat” – the areas considered crucial to protect a threatened or endangered species. Habitat loss, fueled by human development and the climate crisis, is the primary cause of extinction.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund argues the government’s decision to weaken ESA protections is not just misguided, but illegal. The ESA requires threatened and endangered species to have legal protections, but the Services’ rules strip those required protections away. Further, the lawsuit alleges the Services failed to adequately consider arguments against the rules at the proposal phase or consider the environmental impacts of the rules — violating the Administrative Procedure Act and the National Environmental Policy Act.
For more information, visit aldf.org.