(ANIMAL TESTING) The Safe Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Act of 2013 (SCPCPA) is looking to change the regulation of cosmetics in the United States, but will potentially put over 11 million animals in harms way.

The Coalition for Consumer Information on Cosmetics (CCIC) and the Leaping Bunny Program are concerned the SCPCPA will require millions of subjects for cosmetic animal testing, in addition to costing companies billions of dollars to carry out these tests.

Continue reading below to understand the problems the SCPCPA will bring to animals if the legislation is passed. — Global Animal

Bunnies, rats, mics, testing on animals, animal testings
New legislation could put over 11 million animals in harms way. Photo Credit: China Photos/Getty Images

Coalition for Consumer Information on Cosmetics

PHILADELPHIA—The Coalition for Consumer Information on Cosmetics (CCIC), which operates the Leaping Bunny Program in the U.S. and Canada, has serious concerns about the Safe Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Act of 2013 (SCPCPA), H.R. 1385, legislation intended to overhaul the way cosmetic products are regulated in the United States.

Recently published research shows that up to 11.5 million animals would be required to test and retest finished products and ingredients for safety, reversing a decades-long decline in animal testing for cosmetics.

The article, “Safety Evaluations Under the Proposed US Safe Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Act of 2013: Animal Use and Cost Estimates,” published on January 24, 2014 in ALTEX, a peer-reviewed scientific journal, calculated that passage of the SCPCPA will result in a minimum of one million animals being used in new required testing and will cost companies between $1.7-$9 billion to perform these tests, a dramatic increase over current testing costs and numbers of animals used.

Co-author of the article Jean Knight states,

“In reading the Act, I was surprised to see that it would increase animal testing of cosmetics, since this is counter to the worldwide trend to reduce animal testing.

The Act’s language can’t be easily understood unless you have some background in toxicology, so this impact was flying under the radar.

Many Leaping Bunny certified companies were actually supporting the Act, unaware of the implications for animal testing. The article hopefully brings this information onto the radar so that people can make informed decisions.”

Chinese scientists learn a new method that will replace a cruel eye irritation test used on rabbits. Photo Credit: PETA
Chinese scientists learn a new method that will replace a cruel eye irritation test used on rabbits. Photo Credit: PETA

Sue Leary, Chair of the CCIC states,

“The authors of this article have done a great service in demonstrating that SCPCPA is a regressive bill. There has been a decisive move in recent years away from cruel and unnecessary animal testing but this bill reverses that.

It’s hard to imagine why legislators would want to increase animal testing for things like lipstick and shampoo. Consumers certainly don’t want this and companies don’t either.”

CCIC believes the passage of this act is the wrong approach, and the United States should instead harmonize its cosmetics laws with those of the European Union, Israel, and India, which prohibit the use of animals to test cosmetics and their component ingredients while ensuring consumer safety.

leaping bunny cruelty free logoThe Leaping Bunny Program offers the most up-to-date list of companies that have committed to no new animal testing throughout their manufacturing process, from ingredients to finished products. The Leaping Bunny Logo is consistently ranked by third parties as the cruelty-free logo that can be trusted the most.

Read more about the SCPCPA here: http://leapingbunny.org/SafeCosmeticsAct.php 

Take the leap! See ways you can make your voice heard by visiting The Leaping Bunny’s Take Action page.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS:

SHARE