(ANIMAL TESTING) Pamela Anderson is taking a stand against the FDA’s recommendation to test tobacco products on animals. Tobacco companies will often make rats breathe tobacco smoke for up to six hours a day for months on end, then kill them to study the damage on their bodies. The FDA’s recommendation is highly misguided as rats don’t contract the same diseases as humans, and the tobacco companies have used the findings from animal testing to mislead the public and deny the link between smoking and cancer. Read more below and click the Take Action Mouse to write a comment to the FDA urging them not to support animal testing. — Global Animal
Pamela Anderson takes a stand against animal testing. Photo Credit: Ecorazzi
Ecorazzi, Jennifer Mishler
Pamela Anderson tweeted last night, calling for an end to animal testing for tobacco products.
- Click to urge the FDA not to support animal testing for tobacco products!
Her tweet linked to PETA’s campaignagainst the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products’ draft recommendation that some tobacco products be tested on animals. According to the animal rights organization, “This guidance would allow companies to conduct cruel animal tests to demonstrate the ‘reduced risks’ of new products and ingredients.”
PETA says that the tests are not beneficial to humans, as animals that are forced to breathe in the smoke do not develop the same diseases that humans do. The organization also claims the tobacco industry has misled the public with those results for decades, denying the link between smoking and cancer.
They go on to describe some of the testing. “In some of the horrendous tobacco tests that could be conducted, rats would be forced to breathe tobacco smoke for as long as six hours a day for months at a time by jamming the animals into tiny canisters and pumping concentrated cigarette smoke directly into their noses. The animals would then be killed and their bodies dissected,” PETA writes.
Belgium, Germany and the U.K. have all banned animal testing for tobacco products, and PETA also points out that Canada uses “modern, non-animal methods” to test the products’ safety. They are asking the public to urge the FDA to do the same: “We need to tell the FDA loudly and clearly that no more animals should suffer and die for these archaic, inaccurate, and cruel tests on products that we already know are deadly when used as directed! Please exercise your right as a U.S. citizen to submit a polite comment to the FDA urging it to remove any language recommending or allowing animal tests from its draft guidance on tobacco product testing.”
More Ecorazzi: http://www.ecorazzi.com/2012/05/29/pamela-anderson-to-fda-end-tobacco-animal-testing/
and a portion of your purchase – in any department – is donated to Global Animal Foundation.
si ya se sabe que el tabaco es malo, para que mas experimentaciones? tendrian que prohibir que le echen veneno al tabaco y ya esta ademas hay gente que fuma porque quiere pues que prueben con ellos a lo largo de sus vidas
This is clearly a ridiculous idea from the FDA. The risks of tobacco are well known. If Canada can test these new tobacco products without animals, why can’t the FDA? How many more animals must suffer and die because of the whim of humans to consume toxic smoke from tobacco?
I have mentioned this article on another forum, to draw attention to this issue. Thank you, Global Animal, for publishing it.
If they want to put gruesome pictures on cigarette packs of the results of smoking for people – I would suggest they put pictures on cigarette packs of the animals who suffer to prove something that is already known.More…
As if anyone needs to know that tobacco will kill you in more ways than one. Really evil and cruel to torture these poor animals.
Humans are animals and they even purchase it!!!
we ALREADY know what tobacco and other chemiclas do! geesh. completely senseless!!!
There is something profoundly wrong with the desire to test tobacco – a known harmful substance – on animals. The harmful effects are well-established. How ignorant on the FDA’s part. Honestly.